PAUL AUSTIN MURPHY ON POLITICS
PAUL AUSTIN MURPHY ON POLITICS
The subjects covered in this blog include Slavoj Žižek, IQ tests, Chomsky, Tony Blair, Baudrillard, global warming, sociobiology, Islam, Islamism, Marx, Foucault, National/International Socialism, economics, the Frankfurt School, philosophy, anti-racism, etc... I've had articles published in The Conservative Online, American Thinker, Philosophy Now, Intellectual Conservative, Human Events, Faith Freedom, Brenner Brief (Broadside News), New English Review, etc... (Paul Austin Murphy's Philosophy can be found here
Wednesday, 31 March 2010
How Serious are We? [by Shiva]
How serious are we?
Yes how serious are we if many here are not prepared to look at at root cause of islamic extremism
Does any one think that stopping a few loud mouths is going to stop mosques sprouting up like mushrooms
If you are really serious, then you should spend a little time learning the history of islam instead of comparing the bible and koran.
I am not worried about Choudary and co he has got a big mouth and is spilling the beans on islam, it is foolish to shut him up because he is telling the truth.
I am worried about those who say that say islam is a religion of peace, they are lying through there teeth
There is no where in the koran that states that islam is peaceful, yet after evert major attack the moderate spokesmen for is flood the media, and their favorite line is
This is not islam because the koran states "He who kills a person, it is as if he has killed the whole world"
They never say what verse it is, and worse still how of you have ever bothered to check it out
32. On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people.Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.
33. The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;
Strangely Bin Laden has used the whole passage to justify his actions.
the key line for Bin laden being "for spreading mischief in the land"
In the islamic context for spreading mischief in the land includes speaking against allah or mohammed hence we saw more moslems protesting the danish cartoons than we saw after the London bombings.
I loathe to say this but most people here do not have a clue to what you are up against
Millions of pounds is being spent on the construction of mosque and islamic schools so is to islamize Britain
It is time to get serious and face the dragon, not the yapping poodles like choudary and co