The subjects covered in this blog include Slavoj Žižek, IQ tests, Chomsky, Tony Blair, Baudrillard, global warming, sociobiology, Islam, Islamism, Marx, Foucault, National/International Socialism, economics, the Frankfurt School, philosophy, anti-racism, etc... I've had articles published in The Conservative Online, American Thinker, Philosophy Now, Intellectual Conservative, Human Events, Faith Freedom, Brenner Brief (Broadside News), New English Review, etc... (Paul Austin Murphy's Philosophy can be found here

Sunday, 8 February 2015

Sarah Champion: Rotherham's Labour MP & Hypocrite

Updated: Sarah Champion was once the Minister for Preventing Abuse in Jeremy Corbyn's Shadow Cabinet. She resigned in June 2016; following a vote of no confidence in Corbyn. Champion returned to the frontbench in July 2016. In October 2016, Corbyn appointed her to the role of Shadow Minister for Women and Equalities.

Sarah Champion, a Labour MP in Rotherham since 2012, once said that Nigel Farage was a "voyeuristic tourist" because he was doing his job as a politician in Rotherham. She also said that he was "rubbernecking" at the victims of the many Muslim grooming-gangs in that town.

What's worse, she tweeted that it was "hilarious" that he'd been trapped in the party's office by those extreme Leftists who believe that violence can be used to achieve political ends.

It's ironic that Sarah Champion mentioned the word “tourist” because many locals in Rotherham said that very few of the protesters against Nigel Farage were actually from Rotherham. And before that example of left-wing violence and intimidation, it can safely be said that nearly all the SWP-UAF protests in Rotherham (against Nazifascistbigots!) had been mainly made up of middle-class white Trotskyists from London and the Home Counties.


People had known about the Muslim grooming gangs of Rotherham (as well as those in many other cities and towns in the U.K.) since 1996. It was certainly common knowledge by around 2000. (It was in Keighley and Bradford!)

Sarah Champion first spoke out in 2013 – and then only after an academic Report on grooming went public. (She must trust academics more than she trusts the people of Rotherham.) That was 18 years later and 1 year after she'd become an MP in Rotherham (in 2012). Before that, Sarah Champion had lived and worked in Rotherham; so she would have known about the Muslim gangs well before her first pronouncements in 2013/14. (See this piece about the UKip MP who was sued by Sarah Champion for stating these truths.)

One person who knew about the abuse wrote to Sarah Champion in 2012. Vice tells us

"He [Mr Cole] wrote that she needed to get her hands dirty and speak out. Cole told Champion, 'I was warning about people in that gang in 2005 - RMBC ignored these concerns'. Champion assured him that she believed that 'we have a strong system in place'..."

In other words, Sarah Champion only spoke out when the shit hit the fan - and only then!

So why is it verboten for the Conservative Party or UKip to have any connections whatsoever to Nazi and fascist groups; yet the Labour Party has all sorts of connections to many revolutionary socialist groups and individuals: such as UAF, Hope Note Hate, the SWP and many other violent “anti-fash”. Why this double-standard?

Not only that: Labour's Sarah Champion finds Leftist violence against UKip “hilarious”. What would she have said had an imam (or any Muslim) been trapped in a mosque with the “far right” outside? (I don't need to answer that – do I?) 

Sarah Champion also once said (to the ITV News - 27th August 2014) that in the U.K. most abusers are white. That's simply because most people in the U.K. are white. It's proportionality that matters. Virtually every sex-groomer in Rotherham was a Muslim and virtually every victim was white (a non-Muslim). Apart from that, she used the words “1,400 abusers” - that's the figure for the victims, not the abusers. She was clearly “lying for Justice” (as progressives/Leftists put it). In more detail, on 27th of August, she said: 

"Of the 1,400 abusers, I don't know how many were of Asian descent. What I do know is...95%...are single white males." 

 Rotherham's Enablers of Sexual-Grooming

Gordon Jelley (Rotherham Social Worker & SWP)

Gordon Jelley, according to Socialist Worker (in the article ‘Rotherham child abuse – blame cops and the cuts, not political correctness’), “worked as a training officer for social workers in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, between 2005 and 2009”.

What it didn't also tell us is that he’s also a member of the SWP. In fact Gordon Jelley writes for Socialist Worker and Socialist Review. (Both are SWP publications. Here is Jelley writing about a book called Radical Social Work Today.) He also wrote for Socialist Worker as a “Rotherham local government officer for Unison”. And here’s his Twitter page.

Phil Turner (Rotherham Advertiser & SWP)

The Socialist Workers Party also interviewed Phil Turner on these matters. He's a member of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ).

Phil Turner is also a member of the SWP. (Here he is writing an article for Socialist Worker entitled ‘Remploy workers protest to stop factory closures’.)

In fact Phil Turner is also a reporter for the Rotherham Advertiser. (In 1998, Turner was “dragged to a disciplinary hearing” which “led to a one-day strike” against that newspaper.)

The Rotherham Advertiser is the very same newspaper which will have featured many pieces on the Muslim grooming-gangs in that town. In fact Phil Turner might well have written some of them!

This Trotskyist member of the SWP has also written a piece for the Rotherham Advertiser on – of all things – UKip! (Turner’s piece is called ‘UKip linked to European far right organisation’.)

Unlike most regional newspapers, the Rotherham Advertiser isn’t scared of fusing explicit editorial comment and factual detail. For example, here’s a self-referential piece entitled ‘Advertiser dismisses BNP campaigner’s claims of sex grooming cover-up’ in which the Rotherham Advertiser says that the "BNP attempted to make political gain" over the Advertiser‘s own “cover-up” of the reality of Muslim grooming-gangs.

And the SWP-UAF, the Labour Party and all other parties don’t do that kind of thing? In fact when the Rotherham Advertiser (along with Sarah Champion MP) said that the BNP and UKip have “attempted to make political gain”, it can be said that they too have attempted to make political gain by saying that the BNP and UKip have attempted to make political gain.

Ged Demsey (Unite & SWP)

Ged Demsey is on the National Executive Council of the Unite Union and a member of the Labour Party. He's also an far-left activist in Rotherham.

He too was been interviewed by Socialist Worker.

Although speaking in a “personal capacity” (i.e., as a supporter of the SWP) – Demsey says that the Labour Party should “fight back with progressive and radical policies that offer a real alternative”. Does Mr. Demsey mean the sort of policies which are offered by the Socialist Workers Party?

Ged Demsey himself says:

“… we want the police, council officials and councillors to be held accountable for their failure to safeguard Pakistani and white children.”

Yes, you read that correctly.

Ged Demsey talks about Pakistani children being abused. Now Pakistani children may well be abused by their own families. However, what about the 1,400 white girls who were the victims of Muslim grooming gangs? Not a single Pakistani or Muslim girl was a victim.

Here again you have Leftists fusing general child abuse with the specific case of Muslim sexual-grooming gangs. And in so doing, these Leftists are deliberately muddying the water.

Additionally, Ged Demsey said that the “EDL doesn’t point out that most offenders for child abuse are white”. He then continues by saying that these abusers “include celebrities and people from the judiciary, politicians and the establishment”.

Demsey is moronically referring to the late celebrity Jimmy Savile. The Jimmy Savile case saturated the airways and the tabloids for weeks, as have cases about “the judiciary, politicians and the establishment”. And besides which, of course “most offenders for child abuse are white” because most British people are white.


No comments:

Post a Comment