Rather disingenuously (or deceitfully), Newcastle's Chronicle says that Newcastle City Councilor Dipu Ahad was simply guilty of “mocking the English Defence League”. That's funny. Racial smears against blacks or against brown Muslims aren't usually deemed to be simple cases of 'mocking'. Yet calling all EDL supporters 'white' and 'thick' is simple mockery? How does that work, exactly? If I were to say that every Muslim is brown and thick, would that be seen as mere mockery too? Of course not! What if I said that all black footballers are black and thick?... Do I need to answer that?
For someone who may have well committed a 'hate crime' against whites, it's also ironic that Councillor Dipu Ahad himself has made an official complaint to the police about online racist abuse... against himself. Then again, according to Marxist theory, if whites can only be racists, never the victims of racism, then he's on pretty secure (Marxist) legal ground. In fact Dipu Ahmad is so secure about (Marxist) legal theory that he has given evidence (about being a victim, not a perpetrator, of racism) to the police.
“works extremely hard to create community cohesion. I think it’s outrageous he has been questioned by police about it.”
|She'll be classed as an Uncle (or Auntie) Tom by white, middle-class Leftists.|
Incidentally, Ahad’s ‘hero’ is the Muslim supremacist and black racist Malcolm X. The official Muslim story is that Malcolm X was a black racist until he embraced Islam. But since when has being a Muslim stopped, for example, Arabs and many other Muslims from being racist? Now I know that Malcolm X wasn't an Arab. Nonetheless, there's a strong and long tradition of black (or anti-white) racism in America which seems to be getting worse by the day. But, like Dipu Ahad's message, it can't be racism, can it? Well, according to (Marxist) theory it can't be racist! But who cares about Marxist theory?