The subjects covered in this blog include Slavoj Žižek, IQ tests, Chomsky, Tony Blair, Baudrillard, global warming, sociobiology, Islam, Islamism, Marx, Foucault, National/International Socialism, economics, the Frankfurt School, philosophy, anti-racism, etc... I've had articles published in The Conservative Online, American Thinker, Intellectual Conservative, Human Events, Faith Freedom, Brenner Brief (Broadside News), New English Review, etc... (Paul Austin Murphy's Philosophy can be found here.)
This blog used to be called EDL Extra. I was a supporter (neither a member nor a leader) of the EDL until 2012. This blog has retained the old web address.


Thursday, 18 April 2013

What, exactly, are these young Commies/Trots rebelling against?

That photo above was taken in Wigan. Amazing. But what's even more amazing is that it was taken in 2013 - this year! What the hell's going on here? They may as well be demonstrating against workhouses of British slavery.

I think that many these young “rebels”, overwhelmingly middle-class students, think they are rebelling by being Communists or Trotskyists. Some other young rebels, usually not students and not middle class, have rebelled in better, newer, or at least in more genuinely rebellious ways.

It’s strange that white middle-class students still rebel in this way. Both Communism and Trotskyism (plus other Leftist offshoots) have been very prominent in Europe and American for over 60 years. (Trotskyism more in the last 30 to 40 years.) Leftists have taken over many parts of many universities, parts of the BBC, parts of the churches, many parts of local councils, etc. The Left also rules many of Antonio Gramsci's "hegemonic institutions” from the law to the charities to “rights groups”.

The even more bizarre thing is that many – but not all – of the parents of these young Trotskyists and, less so, Communists, were probably Commies/Trots at university as well! How can you rebel against parents who believe largely the same things as you? (Though the parents won’t dress in the same way or listen to the same music as their kids.) In fact, their parents are probably still Trots of some kind - though they won't march and shout as much as the rich kids in the photo anymore. They don't need to. A large part of the their Establishment is already Leftist!

Many Labour Party bigwigs were former Communists at university. But why be a member of a group like the SWP-UAF, etc. when you can become the Government, or just the Opposition, and do far more damage – or “radical change” - to the UK? Groups like the SWP-UAF, etc. are probably seen as playground revolutionaries by those Trots/Communists/socialists at the top; whether Gareth Peirce the Trotskyist super-lawyer or all those "ex-communists" in the Labour Party. In fact, many upper-middle-class Trotskyist professionals, such as lawyers and "rights activists", may think that all the noise and bother of Street Trotskyists like the SWP-UAF actually sets radicalisation and even revolution back somewhat. After all, Gramsci explicitly stated, over 70 years ago, that a revolution in society - and even in the state! - can come about without violence or without blood on the streets (although this seemed to upset him). The old 19th-century or Bolshevik notion of “storming the barricades” is dead. Such a thing only appeals to those Leftist activists (of which there are many) who really prefer the violence-bit to the actual revolution/radicalisation-bit. (That is, many Leftists like violence but for some reason or other they feel the need to tart that fact up with "a bit of politics".)


  1. Apparently, you're living in a parallel universe where the BBC, the other state propaganda mechanisms and the establishment in general are 'leftists' or communists, rather than Zionist-supporting, capitalist, right-wingers.

    1. The BBC isn’t Communist – it’s either left or left-liberal. I’m talking here about its overall editorial and management position.

      You’re not one of those Leftists who fits the word “Zionist” into every sentence are you?

      Much of the establishment is most definitely left wing or left-liberal; some are even Trots or Communists: much of the Law, numerous lecturers and professors and academics, the Guardian, the Independent, the New Statesman, many ‘rights groups” and “civil liberties groups”, the higher echelons of the police (not the rank and file), parts of the Church, various councils, the arts… and so on. Of course if you’re a my-leftism-is-more-extreme-than- yours Leftist, like the guy above, then of course none of these people or groups will be Leftist enough for you. Then again, I guess you’re a young Trot or Communist who plays the revolutionary up until the age of around 25 and then you’ll become either a conventional person or like the small-cocked Leftists in the Establishment who, for the moment, you despise. Who knows, when you grow up you may become the next Gareth Peirce (the posh lawyer) and be a firm Trotskyist pillar of the Establishment.

  2. Your a disgrace, you came up to us weren't even wanting to have a conversation. We will proudly stay in Wigan and around the UK, we are a ever growing movement. LONG LIVE COMMUNISM, LONG LIVE STALIN!

    1. I don’t understand this comment. I have used an image about Wigan made by someone else.I have never been to Wigan.

      Are you serious? Do you really mean “Long live Stalin”? I think this is a spoof. Or are you retarded?

      A "growing movement"? Is that in the sense that the "movement" has grown from 5 middle-class students to 7 middle-class students?... The 'capitalist state' must be shitting itself.

  3. This entire piece is skewed and not very well researched or thought out - in terms of the CPGB-ML it is incorrect in its knowledge of the party (or rather lack of knowledge!).

    1. I find it incredible that people say stuff like “this entire piece is skewed and not very well researched or thought out” but don’t feel the need to tell me WHY. The only thing you do mention is the CPGB – but, sadly for you, I don’t actually mention that party in the piece.

      So in which ways is it “skewed” (isn’t every political article skewed” in some way?) and in WHICH WAYS is in not “well-researched” or “thought out”? Or would that require a Leftist to actually think rather than memorise Marx/Chomsky or some leftist soundbites?

      “The independent minds of the herd of Leftists.”