A little fact that might interest you. Soviet Russia was not a Christian nation when it invaded Afghanistan. Or do you think that if they are not Muslim, then they must be Christian? Or is it because Russians are (mainly) white? The USSR was an atheist state, but don’t let inconvenient facts get in the way.
“Most Russians are Orthodox Christians. And, yes, they are a Christian nation. I am proud to live in Great Britain. That is not an issue. But to attack Muslims on a few terrorists who kill all human beings, and yes, they are terrorists. By analysing Christian and Muslim nations we could easily see that Christians have been responsible for more wars and deaths then Muslim nations. 1, 2 and 3 crusades = Christians.”
You talk about the Christian Crusades, but wasn’t a sizable part of the whole world conquered by Muslims on behalf of the Islamic crusade, as Islamists are all to keen to tell us? You are either for crusades/Jihad, or you are against them. If you are against the Christian crusades, you should also be against Islamic Jihad. But, of course, you won’t be.
“I am against the killings of Human beings by anyone.”
Hiroshima and Nagasaki = Christians"
Yes, a lot of Christians were involved in these nuclear bombings, but so too were some Jews and Hindus. Perhaps some of the scientists were Muslims. But Hiroshima wasn’t bombed as part of a Christian crusade, although you would probably dispute that. The Twin Towers, and the thousands of other deaths, have been the result of an explicit Jihad, as said by the Jihadists themselves.
“The point is although it was not a Christian jihad like the crusades were, but Christian nations did do it. If those were Muslim nations and had only done it due to war you would still attach the attack with Islam and Jihad.
British colonialism = Christian annihilation"
I would say that the death count of Muslim-on-Muslim death (e.g., Sunni versus Shia, Wahhabis versus every other Muslim sect, Arab Muslims versus Pakistani Muslims, this Muslim tribe in Pakistan versus that Muslim tribe in Saudi Arabia) is well over a hundred a week, from Iraq to Indonesia.
How can she speak out against violence when she supports many violent Islamic terrorists and her religion was built on the back of conquest and annihilation? The 'Prophet' himself personally beheaded hundreds of infidels and Muslims.
“British colonialism = Christian annihilation
Americans and Russia, both Christian nations fighting their wars in Columbia, Vietnam, Korea and Afghanistan killing millions = Christians.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki = Christians
Support and aid to OBL, Saddam Hussein, Col Gadaffi, and all the African states = Christian nations.
WW1 and WW2 started by Christians.
1, 2 and 3 crusades = Christians.
Sanctions on Iraq killing 500,000 children = Christians.
And you say Muslims are evil. Look in the mirror.”
Why not 'boycott' North Korea, or the Sudan, or Iran, or Saudi Arabia, or Pakistan, and all the other regimes which are much worse than Israel? Why? Because the Israel/Palestine thing has always been a trendy subject for leftists and left-liberals. Why doesn't the Jihab-wearing politician (in the video) mention Hamas and its indiscriminate bombing of children and schools in Israel? Because many Muslims, and leftists, are anti-Semitic.
“Bet you don’t mind a curry or using Saudi oil."