Thursday, 18 August 2016
Wednesday, 29 June 2016
There's something very suspicious about this. Have anti-immigrant actions really increased since Brexit? Or is it that Leftists and Liberals are now focussing on actions which have occurred long before Brexit? In other words, it's the focus that's changed, not the number of attacks.
Think about it. Why should anti-Europeans start now, after they've been successful with Brexit – rather than before, when no one cared what they thought?
Is the Guardian saying that they were very few racist attacks before Brexit? Of course not... Well, I've never heard that paper say that before.
In other words, the rate of attacks hasn't changed, and the nature of actions hasn't changed. What has changed is that Leftists are milking these actions for political gain.
Tuesday, 28 June 2016
The Guardian and BBC have been heavily propagating the ostensible fact that young people overwhelmingly voted to Remain. This isn't true when you consider the diverse age-ranges used to advance various positions and the fact that a large number of under 25 year olds didn't vote at all. According to one poll, only 36% of 18 to 25 year olds voted in the Referendum. So, if anything, one conclusion could be that many yoofs don't care either way.
In addition to the romanticising of the young, we've also had the denigration and hatred of the old. For example, one BBC article focussed on the evil over-50s. Another Leftist individual talked about those Naziracistfascistbigots that make up the over-75s.
Still, when they're over 25, some of these (mainly middle-class) yoofs will no doubt end up writing for the Guardian and BBC. Or alternatively, they may become Trotskyist lawyers who will have the hots for Muslim terrorists.
And look at the un-enviromental mess Holy Youth left at Glastonbury!
The fact is that many young people are extremely intolerant, bigoted and naive. The young, after all, made up Chairman Mao's Red Guard, the Khmer Rouge and Hitler Youth. Read history before you put young people on pedestals.
Monday, 27 June 2016
I don't think that I've ever be so repulsed by a Leftist as I was by this arrogant and snooty Leftist. She literally despises all those who dare to disagree with her. The totalitarian instincts of the Left are clearly on display here.
She has a go a Brits generally and then “the over 75s” - and that's after dismissing the whole of America. Apparently the Brexit vote was mainly the responsibility of the over 75s. They “have no stake in this country”. Did you know that? She seems to have forgotten that over seventeen million people voted for Brexit. What proportion of that number were 75 and older, eh?
Europeans, on the other hand, are “kind and thoughtful”. Yes, this woman - with typical Leftist wisdom - fails to disconnect Europe from the European Union.
It's just the sheer snobbery and arrogance of this woman that grates. As I said, not endorsing her own views is to be culpable, in her book. And I've already heard the supporters of Remain say that the referendum should never have happened. And now that it has happened, it should be retaken until the correct result occurs.
Clearly, inside the heart of every liberal is a totalitarian racist trying to get out. This woman is as near to being an anti-white and anti-British racist as it's possible to be.
Sunday, 26 June 2016
Critics of Islam need to know about the Islamic “Golden Age” because it will be thrown at them on various occasions. That Golden Age ended in the 13th century A.D... Actually, according to many historians, it ended even earlier than that - in the 12th or even the 11th century.
True, at this period there was a lot of culture and civilisation in the Muslim world (depending on when and depending on where). Yet that was around eight centuries ago – at the least! Not only that: virtually the entire Islamic Golden Age was engendered by the influence of Greek philosophy and science; as well as of Jewish and Christian theology and Persian and Indian culture.
It is, therefore, a sign of desperation that Muslims need to go back so far in order to sell us the idea that Islam “is a religion of culture.... and peace”.
Even during the Islamic Golden Age minorities were still persecuted and jihad was still fought. In fact culture and science were some of the results of Islamic imperialism. So, yes, there were also periods of peace and culture.
The thing is that “Islamic culture” was not actually Islamic: it was Muslim. That is, the various cultural flowerings had very little - or nothing - to do with Islam and the Koran.
Basically, Muslims simply shouldn't need to mention what happened in the 12th century in order to sell Islam to the unbeliever.
Islam's Contribution to Western Culture
All this by way of a response to the claim that Islam has made “many contributions to Western culture”.
For example, take this passage from Irshad Manji:
“Let me highlight a handful of Islam’s contributions to Western culture. The guitar. Cough syrup. The university. Algebra. Mocha coffee...” (page 65)
This is one of the most common mistakes you can find in defence of Islam.
How can Islam itself have contributed the guitar, cough syrup, algebra, etc. to Western culture? How can a religion, or the Koran, the hadith, etc. have contributed these things?
It's absolutely ridiculous to claim that Islam - a religion primarily based on the Koran - could have had an hand in the invention of the guitar, algebra, cough syrup syrup, etc. Which passages in the Koran, or the hadith, etc. helped contribute to the creation of algebra? Which passages even helped inspire the invention of cough syrup? Again, this is plain silly!
What Manji must really mean is that people who happened to have been Muslims made these contributions to Western culture. Islam itself had absolutely nothing to do with it. I suppose we could say that Islam might have obliquely inspired these Muslims to invent these things. But those causal affects are very oblique indeed.
We can even say that these scientists, poets, inventors, mathematicians, etc. invented or created these things in spite of Islam, not because of it. Perhaps Islam, on the whole, got in the way of their inventions or creations – i.e., it didn’t help or inspire them. In fact it often did get in the way.
We can also say that these inventions and creations happened in spite of Islam, not because of it. Algebra, the guitar, cough syrup, etc. wouldn’t have been created or invented if it weren’t for the vitally important precedents which came from infidel (or non-Muslim) cultures. Even if Muslims were the inventors or creators of all these things, they wouldn’t have been the inventors or creators of any of them if it weren’t for the groundwork done by the infidels of ancient Greece, Rome, India, Persia, etc.
Above and beyond all that, some of the examples of “Islam’s contributions to Western culture” are a bit suspect anyway. Apart from the fact that every one of these examples would have required non-Muslim antecedents to set the groundwork, it's unquestionably the case that algebra is not a Muslim invention. Algebra goes back to the ancient Greeks. And it's also said that Diophantus (3rd century AD) was “the father of algebra”. He lived around 300 years before Islam.
So perhaps all Manji meant is that Muslims, not Islam itself, added to the tradition and extent of algebra. Muslims, let alone Islam, certainly didn’t invent or discover it!
As for both the guitar and the university, it depends on how these words or concepts are defined. Guitar-like instruments date back to various ancient cultures - all of them pre-dating Islam by hundreds if not thousands of years (especially in ancient India and Asia). Perhaps, in the end, Manji is only taking about the word ‘guitar’ itself (as also with the word algebra!). Yes, that word comes from an Andalusian Arabic source; though that doesn’t mean that Muslims - let alone Islam - invented the guitar.
Exactly the same kinds of thing can be said about Manji’s other examples of “contributions to Western culture”. Again, the idea that Islam itself - rather than people who happened to be Muslims (whom themselves were hugely indebted to non-Muslim culture and knowledge) - invented or created any of these things is plainly ridiculous. Indeed to say that Islam contributed, or invented, or created, algebra or anything else is a grammatical or conceptual mistake.
Because of all that, the same criticism can be levelled at what Manji claims in the very next paragraph. She writes:
“Innovation and the spirit of ijtihad went hand in glove. In the southern Spanish city of Cordoba, for example, a sexually spunky woman named Wallada organised literary salons where people analysed dreams, poetry and the Quran.”
We can even rewrite that passage thus:
A woman - who just happened to be a Muslim - organised literary salons where people analysed dreams, poetry and the Quran.
A more germane point would be:
Did the Koran, etc. inspire or influence this “sexually spunky woman” to ‘analyse’ itself?
All these things were done in spite of Islam, not because of Islam. Would we say that a serial killer - who believed in sleeping with, then killing, everyone he met and in eating worms - was inspired or influenced by Islam simply because he did all these things as a Muslim? More to the point: was Islam to blame or responsible for his serial killing and his eating worms? Of course not. So why can’t we say the same about Muslims who invented the guitar, or cough syrup or who contributed to algebra? And in Manji’s other example, was Islam itself (or the Koran itself) response for this Cordoban woman’s spunkiness or her penchant for salon discussions about poetry, dreams, etc.?
Thus the basic question is:
Did Islam itself contribute to Western Culture? Or, alternatively, was it simply Muslims (under the profound influence of non-Islamic culture) who did so?
Tuesday, 7 June 2016
The two images above sum up the sickness that is contemporary Leftism.
In the top image, Jeremy Corbyn speaks in front of the Communist hammer and sickle. Can you imagine, say, David Cameron doing the same in front of a swastika? It simply wouldn't happen. The Left, for one, wouldn't allow it to happen. Yet here's a contemporary British politician, and the Leader of the Opposition, speaking in front of a banner which symbolises political slavery and mass death. Yes, on many accounts, communism/socialism claimed more than 100 million lives - and far more minds - in the 20th century. It enslaved in the name of equality. It repressed in the name of socialism. It killed en masse for Leftist collectivism. And all that was worth it – well, according to Corbyn's press officer/adviser – Seamus Mile (the ex-public schoolboy, and Guardian editor) – it was worth it.
Then there's Red Kenneth below, who'll support all manner of racists, misogynists, killers, etc. as long as they ain't Western and white. Such is Ken's profound racism. He's posing in the image with his long-standing political lover – Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Qaradawi's Muslim Brotherhood is a long-time feeder of al-Qaeda. It started its own terrorist campaign of bombings and assassinations in the early 1930s – around 25 years before the creation of Israel and around 80 years before the interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Let's destroy these twin collectivist evils before they destroy us. No surrender!
Friday, 3 June 2016
This fat Muslim git - and his 20 stones of obscene flesh - has been captured by the Syrian army.
His nickname is the Bulldozer. This is strange, really, because the Syrian army needed a bulldozer to carry him around. I mean, it's his own fault that he's a fat twat – he eats at least 30 beef (not pork – halal!) burgers every day.
Just think about this sad, fat man. Along came the Islamic State (which “has nothing to do with Islam”, apparently), and it provided a perfect opportunity for him to kill, torture and not feel guilty about it. After all, Islam sanctions killing and other violent perversions – and it does so on a massive scale.
The details of his capture are also comedic in the extreme – just as he is. This Islamic executioner writhed around on the ground, topless, as he attempted to evade the Syrian army. I hope the video of this will become as popular (amongst Muslims) as the videos showing this sick man kill for Islam.
What are we talking about here?
We're talking about a subhuman who has a thing for chopping children's limbs off, as well for that Islamic/Koranic speciality – beheading. This man, after all, belonged to the Islamic State's “Chopping Committee”, which is now looking for yet more ways of fusing sadism with Islam.